Tag: wine scores

Categories
News

James Suckling’s top 100 wines of 2024

James Suckling 2024 top wine Bertani Amarone della Valpolicella Classico 2015
  • James Suckling’s top 100 wines of 2024 list has been released.
  • His wine of the year is Bertani Amarone della Valpolicella Classico 2015. 
  • Italy dominates the rankings followed by France and the US.

American critic James Suckling has released his top 100 wines of 2024 list, along with his wine of the year. Based on tens of thousands of bottles tasted and rated over the year, the list highlights wines that combine exceptional quality, character, and accessibility.

For 2024, Suckling’s Wine of the Year is Bertani Amarone della Valpolicella Classico 2015, awarded a perfect 100-point score. Italy dominates the rankings overall, followed by France and the United States, reflecting both traditional strongholds and evolving global demand.

This article breaks down the James Suckling Top 100, explains how the list is compiled, explores regional performance, and highlights what collectors and investors can learn from the 2024 results.

How the James Suckling Top 100 is compiled

James Suckling’s rankings are underpinned by scale and consistency. Over the past year, Suckling and his international tasting team reviewed more than 40,000 wines, producing detailed tasting reports, vintage analyses, and regional breakdowns.

Unlike many critics, Suckling’s approach is deliberately broad. The bottles tasted and rated span:

  • Everyday wines priced below $20

  • Estate wines from leading regions such as Bordeaux, Burgundy, and Napa Valley

  • Limited-production cuvées from small, high-quality producers

The Top 100 list is then selected from this vast dataset, based on more than just numerical scores.

Criteria for inclusion in the Top 100

To qualify for the James Suckling Top 100, wines must meet several key criteria:

  • Minimum production of approximately 5,000 bottles

  • Median release price below $500 (£385)

  • A score typically between 97 and 100 points

  • What Suckling describes as a “wow factor” – an emotional impact that elevates a wine beyond technical excellence

This ensures the final list balances prestige with real-world availability, creating a list of wines that is both aspirational and practical for collectors.

A record year of tasting: More than 40,000 wines reviewed

The scale of Suckling’s tasting operation is unmatched. In 2024 alone:

  • More than 40,000 bottles tasted and rated

  • Hundreds of tasting reports published

  • Wines assessed across all major regions and styles

Each wine is evaluated blind where possible, with scores reflecting overall quality, balance, structure, and ageing potential. These tasting notes form the backbone of the final Top 100 ranking.

Regional overview: Italy leads the James Suckling top 100

Italy once again emerged as the strongest-performing country in the 2024 rankings.

Total wines reviewed in 2024

The countries with the largest representation included:

  • Italy – 9,100 wines

  • France – 9,000 wines

  • United States – 6,800 wines

  • Spain – 3,800 wines

  • Argentina – 2,300 wines

  • Germany – 2,000 wines

  • Australia – 1,700 wines

  • Chile – 1,550 wines

Additional tastings included wines from Greece, Hungary, Canada, Uruguay, and China, highlighting the increasingly global scope of Suckling’s work.

Countries featured in the James Suckling Top 100

Despite intense competition, Italy secured 26 places in the Top 100 – more than any other country. These wines span a wide range of styles and regions, including:

  • Amarone della Valpolicella

  • Barolo

  • Brunello di Montalcino

  • Alto Adige whites

  • Super Tuscan blends

France followed with 18 wines, led by Bordeaux, Champagne, and the Rhône Valley. Burgundy Grand Crus and structured Rhône reds continue to perform strongly, reinforcing France’s long-standing reputation for producing great wine.

The United States placed 15 wines on the list, driven largely by Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon and Oregon Pinot Noir. This confirms the continued global appeal of top-tier American producers.

Germany delivered 12 wines, a standout performance that underscores the growing recognition of dry Riesling as one of the world’s most precise and age-worthy styles.

Chile, Australia, Argentina, and Spain also featured, while China made a notable appearance with Ao Yun Shangri-La 2020, reflecting its rising status in the fine wine market.

Wine of the Year 2024: Bertani Amarone della Valpolicella Classico 2015

At the top of the ranking is Bertani Amarone della Valpolicella Classico 2015, which received a perfect 100-point score.

James Suckling describes the wine as a benchmark expression of Amarone, praising its balance between power and elegance. His tasting notes highlight:

  • Full-bodied structure

  • Filigree, refined tannins

  • Bright, persistent acidity

  • A long, savoury, and complex finish

Suckling calls it a wine that expresses “the greatness of time and place”, emphasising its ability to age gracefully while remaining compelling today.

The selection of an Amarone as Wine of the Year is particularly significant. It reflects growing international appreciation for Italy’s traditional red wines beyond the established icons of Barolo and Brunello.

James Suckling top wine scores 2024

Value and accessibility: a defining theme of 2024

One of the most striking aspects of the James Suckling Top 100 Wines of 2024 is its focus on accessibility.

According to Suckling:

  • Nine wines in the Top 100 are priced between $30 and $60

  • Many highly rated white wines remain attractively priced

  • The second-ranked wine on the list retails for around $65 (£50)

This emphasis on value reflects changing market dynamics, where consumers and collectors alike are seeking great wine without excessive price inflation.

Notable regional highlights

Germany’s breakthrough year

Germany’s strong showing confirms the exceptional quality of recent vintages, particularly for dry Riesling. Wines such as Künstler Riesling Rheingau Hölle GG 2023 demonstrate precision, minerality, and ageing potential.

Austria’s continued rise

Austria continues to build momentum, especially with wines from Wachau. These bottlings offer clarity of terroir and consistency across vintages.

China’s growing presence

The inclusion of Ao Yun Shangri-La 2020 marks a milestone for Chinese wine. Produced at high altitude in the Himalayan foothills, it showcases craftsmanship, innovation, and a distinct regional identity.

What collectors can learn from the James Suckling Top 100

The Top 100 is a snapshot of the global fine wine landscape.

For collectors and investors, it highlights:

  • Shifting stylistic preferences

  • Regions delivering strong value

  • Wines with long-term ageing potential

  • Emerging regions beyond traditional powerhouses

Whether searching alphabetically by winery, sorting by vintage score, or exploring tasting reports, the list offers a curated starting point for building a diverse and forward-looking cellar.

Final thoughts

The James Suckling Top 100 Wines of 2024 reflects a wine world in transition which values authenticity, balance, and accessibility alongside technical excellence.

From Amarone in Veneto to Riesling in Germany and Cabernet Sauvignon in Napa Valley, the list captures the diversity and excitement of today’s fine wine market. For collectors, it provides a reliable guide to wines that deliver both immediate pleasure and long-term promise.

WineCap’s independent market analysis showcases the value of portfolio diversification and the stability offered by investing in wine. Speak to one of our wine investment experts and start building your portfolio. Schedule your free consultation today.

Categories
Learn

The role of wine ratings in fine wine investment

  • Wine ratings play a crucial role in wine investment, with high scores from influential critics impacting demand and market value.
  • To use ratings effectively, investors should consider both the initial score and potential for growth.
  • The Wine Track score provides a broader view of a wine’s quality across multiple vintages and publications, helping investors assess wines at a glance.

In the fine wine market, few factors influence demand and long-term value as powerfully as wine ratings. For collectors and investors building an investment grade wine portfolio, scores from leading critics act as signals – not only of quality, but of longevity, market confidence, and future price potential.

However, while high scores often attract immediate attention, successful wine investment requires a deeper understanding of how ratings work, how they evolve over time, and how they interact with broader market forces such as global demand, scarcity, and drinking windows.

This article explores how wine ratings shape the fine wine market, how investors use them strategically, and why aggregated tools such as the Wine Track Score provide a clearer framework for assessing investment grade wines over the long term.

Why wine ratings matter for investment grade wine

Wine ratings emerged as a way to communicate quality quickly in an increasingly complex global wine industry. Today, they play a central role in shaping demand, pricing, and investor behaviour.

For wine investors, ratings provide insight into:

  • Quality and consistency across vintages

  • Longevity, including projected drinking windows

  • Market demand from collectors and consumers

  • Price stability in the secondary market

  • Investment potential relative to comparable wines

High scores from influential critics such as Robert Parker, Neal Martin, Jancis Robinson, James Suckling, and publications like Wine Spectator can materially affect prices – sometimes within days of publication.

As a result, ratings have become foundational to identifying investment grade wine, particularly for those seeking long-term capital appreciation rather than short-term trading.

How wine ratings influence the fine wine market

The fine wine market operates on reputation, scarcity, and trust. Ratings reinforce all three.

1. Ratings can drive immediate price movements

When a wine receives a benchmark score – especially 99+ or 100 points – it often enters a new tier of desirability.

A clear example is Marqués de Murrieta Castillo Ygay Gran Reserva Especial 2010, which saw rapid secondary-market price appreciation after being named Wine Spectator’s Wine of the Year. Similar reactions have historically followed 100-point scores awarded to Bordeaux First Growths and Burgundy Grand Crus.

For investment grade wine, wine scores act as a catalyst, accelerating demand and compressing supply.

2. Ratings shape long-term reputation

Consistent scoring matters more than isolated highs.

Producers such as:

  • Château Lafite Rothschild

  • Domaine de la Romanée-Conti

  • Harlan Estate

  • Gaja

  • Penfolds Grange

have built long-term investment credibility through repeated critical recognition. This consistency supports price resilience, even during broader market corrections.

For wine investors, this track record is a key differentiator between speculative wines and true investment grade wine.

3. Ratings influence regional prestige and global demand

Critics can also elevate entire regions, beyond just individual wines.

  • Robert Parker’s support helped propel Napa Valley into the global investment spotlight

  • James Suckling championed Super Tuscan wines, accelerating international demand

  • Jancis Robinson played a key role in highlighting Austria’s quality renaissance

As regional reputations rise, so does global demand – a crucial driver of long-term price appreciation in investment grade wine.

Ratings change over time – And so do investment opportunities

One of the most misunderstood aspects of wine ratings is that they are not fixed.

As wine matures in bottle, critics often revisit their assessments. Tannins soften, structure integrates, and complexity develops – sometimes leading to upward score revisions.

The impact of score changes

  • Upward revisions often trigger renewed buying interest

  • Downward revisions may stall demand or price momentum

  • Barrel scores can differ meaningfully from bottled assessments

This evolution creates opportunity for informed investors.

Strategic approaches for investors

  • Buy early when barrel scores and critic commentary are strong

  • Hold strategically as wines approach peak maturity

  • Sell your wine when demand aligns with optimal drinking windows

Understanding how ratings interact with a wine’s maturity curve allows investors to identify undervalued vintages before wider market recognition.

Knowing the critics and their influence on investment grade wine

Not all critics evaluate wine the same way.

Robert Parker, for example, historically favoured powerful, concentrated styles from Bordeaux, California, and the Rhône. As his influence has waned, the critical landscape has diversified, reflecting broader consumer preferences for balance, freshness, and terroir expression.

For wine investors, understanding critic bias is essential. A wine overlooked by one reviewer may be favoured by another, particularly in more divisive regions like Burgundy, Piedmont, or Germany.

This diversity reinforces the importance of looking beyond single scores when assessing investment grade wine.

The Wine Track score – ratings at a glance

To address inconsistency across critics, many investors now rely on aggregated metrics.

The Wine Track Score provides:

  • A unified 100-point score

  • Data from 100+ critics across 12 major publications

  • Vintage-by-vintage performance tracking

  • Insight into producer consistency over time

By smoothing out individual preferences, the Wine Track score offers a more holistic view of investment grade wine performance – particularly useful when comparing regions, estates, or vintages.

Using ratings strategically in a wine investment portfolio

Ratings are most effective when used as part of a broader framework.

1. Identify consistently high-scoring producers

Bordeaux First Growths, Burgundy Grand Crus, and top Napa Cabernet producers continue to anchor the fine wine market because of sustained critical support.

2. Look for sleeper vintages

Some wines receive modest early scores but improve significantly with age. These vintages often offer strong risk-adjusted returns.

3. Understand vintage variation

Even elite producers experience variability. Ratings help identify which vintages offer superior long-term value.

4. Use aggregated data

Relying on multiple critics reduces bias and improves decision-making.

5. Align with drinking windows

Wines approaching peak maturity often see increased demand from drinkers, supporting secondary-market pricing.

Ratings are powerful but not the whole story

While ratings are essential, they are only one part of evaluating investment grade wine.

Investors should also consider:

  • Producer reputation

  • Vineyard classification (e.g. Grand Cru, First Growth)

  • Market liquidity

  • Provenance and storage facility conditions

  • Historical price performance

  • Long-term global demand

Professional storage in bonded warehouses preserves quality and protects value – a critical factor when preparing to sell wine in the future.

Building a long-term investment grade wine portfolio

In today’s fine wine market, ratings remain one of the most influential tools available to investors. They help signal quality, predict demand, and highlight wines with the potential to outperform over time.

However, ratings are most effective when paired with market insight, disciplined storage, and a long-term perspective. When used intelligently, they can help investors build resilient portfolios anchored by true investment grade wine.

WineCap’s independent market analysis showcases the value of portfolio diversification and the stability offered by investing in wine. Speak to one of our wine investment experts and start building your portfolio. Schedule your free consultation today.